anti-word

Sun Jan 13 14:59:10 EST 2002

I do not understand why you do not just accept what he is ready
to send you, since you can easily do the conversion yourself. Why
expect him to do it?

On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Gregory Nowak wrote:

> I think that if I told him to just save it as a text file, he would've been even more confused, unless he was right in front of his monitor able to pull up the save as dialogue right there which he was not at the time.
> Besides, I don't care how they save it, as long as I get the format I asked for.
> Greg
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Amanda Lee wrote:
> > You are correct.  However, all that you needed to do was to point out to
> > your professor that he could easily use "Save As" from the pulldown menu and
> > save his documents for mailing to you in text.  I frequenlty do this when I
> > receive Word documents as I will today for two courses I'm taking this week
> > on Networks and Advanced TCP/IP.  These I will download to my notetaker as
> > they are smaller and there is a book reader function in my notetaker and so
> > I can read these files while I'm in the taxi going to work or whatever.
> >
> > I agree that the Universities are at the root of much of this but ...  they
> > really don't need to know nor do anything other than press the right buttons
> > and click on the desired choice.
> >
> > Amanda Lee
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gregory Nowak" <gnowak1 at uic.edu>
> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: anti-word
> >
> >
> > > Yes, I do. However, you seem to be missing the point I'm trying to get
> > across here. So, let me give you an example.
> > > A professor of mine was handing out something that he had written for the
> > class. Since I knew that he had written it by himself recently, I asked if
> > he could e-mail me a plain text file instead, so I wouldn't need to mess
> > with scannning the handout. His answer to me was: "you mean a word
> > document?" I said "no, I mean a .txt file, a plain ASCII text file." He was
> > still confused, so I said, "like the files that you create with notepad." He
> > said "oh, ok."
> > >
> > > My point is as it was before. If all they know about their computer is how
> > to turn it on and off, then how are they supposed to know about other
> > platforms if they don't even know for sure what a text file?
> > >
> > > If some of you on this list want to blame the ignorant professor, then
> > maybe you should blame universities, employers, and the way we learn and
> > work today. Universities and employers are the ones today who tell you they
> > want your papers in 12 point font, and formatted this way or that. Now, how
> > are we supposed to achieve that in something like notepad/emacs/pico? And if
> > someone else is wondering how the hell this guy became a professor without
> > knowing crap about what kinds of files he could produce on his computer,
> > then that is a new question to examine the answer to.
> > > Greg
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:29:50PM -0500, Janina Sajka wrote:
> > > > Gregory, I keep telling you this answer, but there's some part of it
> > that
> > > > you seem to still miss. What part is that?
> > > >
> > > > They don't need to know a damm thing to retrieve either a text doc (no
> > > > formatting), or an html doc (much formatting).
> > > >
> > > > They need know nothing special in order to do that. Do you understand
> > this
> > > > yet?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And how do you expect them to know about the other platforms if all
> > they know about their windows computer is how to turn it on and off?
> > > > > Greg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:17:03PM -0500, Charles Crawford wrote:
> > > > > > Hello Amanda, Janina and other interested listers,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >          Well, looks like the world of advocacy is impinging on
> > planet
> > > > > > Linux.  It is correct to point out that in the ideal there should
> > not be a
> > > > > > word processing standard imposed by a company, but as we all know,
> > the
> > > > > > sender of a word file getting a text file back might not see the
> > world in
> > > > > > the same way.  Don't you just hate it when that happens.  Smile.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >          I guess my view is that if word users want to communicate
> > with
> > > > > > those who don't use word, then they have to adjust to the realities
> > of
> > > > > > other computer platforms.  Consumer choice still has it's place!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Charlie Crawford.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 11:09 AM 01/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> > > > > > >Amen! to that Janina!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Amanda
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > >From: "Janina Sajka" <janina at afb.net>
> > > > > > >To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > > > > > >Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:06 AM
> > > > > > >Subject: Re: anti-word
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes and if a word document is sent to you for your input and
> > editing,
> > > > > > >I'm
> > > > > > > > > sure the original party would expect the thing to come back in
> > Word
> > > > > > >format
> > > > > > > > > along with the built-in formatting, styles and such.  Some of
> > this whole
> > > > > > > > > anti Word sounds arogant to me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I rather think it arrogant to presume everyone wants and reads
> > Word. I
> > > > > > > > regard it as arrogant to presume we all pay tribute to
> > Microsoft. I
> > > > > > > > further regard it arrogant to treat a proprietary,
> > non-consensus, file
> > > > > > > > format as some kind of standard.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Janina Sajka, Director
> > > > Technology Research and Development
> > > > Governmental Relations Group
> > > > American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
> > > >
> > > > Email: janina at afb.net Phone: (202) 408-8175
> > > >
> > > > Chair, Accessibility SIG
> > > > Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
> > > > http://www.openebook.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*
Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh
The Moon is New