suggestions for Speakup

[Jason Symes]

Wrong. If a synth goes whacky, it must be reinitialized to get it to work
right, and not all synths have an on/off switch.
At 10:06 AM 1/11/02 -0500, you wrote:
>On 11 Jan 2002, Kirk Reiser wrote:
>
>> On another note, mentioning that something should be there because it
>> is part of windows/dos screen review packages is a non-starter with
>> me.  That means we should do something because it is available in that
>> other o.s.  I base what needs to be done on what features seem
>> reasonable to provide better access to linux.  I am not at all
>> interested in keeping up with those other packages.  So if you folks
>> want to make a comparison based on features, you might as well just
>> piss off.
>
>Kirk,
>
>I support your position completely! Speakup is at the point where
>it is vulnerable to the bells and whistles syndrome, where folks
>want to throw in the kitchen sink. Stick to the straight and
>narrow and make sure each feature under consideration really
>belongs in a screen reader. Examples: the cut and paste feature
>really did belong; the reinitialization feature really does not.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*<<<=-=>>>*
>Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh
>The Moon is Waning Crescent (4% of Full)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
Jason Symes