software speech for speakup
Shaun Oliver
shauno at goanna.net.au
Thu May 17 09:57:20 EDT 2001
well, bugger it! I agree chuck.
Shaun..
"Has anyone ever tasted an "END"? Are they really bitter?"
EMAIL: shauno at goanna.net.au ICQ: 76958435
YAHOO ID: blindman01_2000 IRC NICK/SERVER: |3|1ndm4n on #aussiefriends on
www.jong.com:6667
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Charles Hallenbeck wrote:
> This discussion is improving as it proceeds, I think!
>
> One more factor to consider is the desirability of offloading peripheral
> tasks to peripheral processors so that the central processor(s) do not
> have to service absolutely everything that happens inside the
> cabinet. Input-Output tasks are ideal candidates for offloading from the
> CPU. That is done in IDE devices, in video cards, in real modems (as
> opposed to Win modems), in keystroke processing inside the keyboard,
> etcetera. Software speech synthesis is a fairly heavy duty processing
> load, and if it can be handed off to an 80186 or whatever, that is very
> good news for the CPU.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> My web site is http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh
> The Moon is Waning Crescent (30% of Full)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
More information about the Speakup
mailing list