some networking questions, I'm slightly confused
Gregory Nowak
gnowak1 at uic.edu
Mon Dec 10 11:15:18 EST 2001
As far as I know, the actual t1 line comes into the phone equipment which is in the basement (in fact, the entire central
switching office for this building is there). Then, as I understand it, the digital signals
for the t1 ride on the same cat5 wires
in this building as the phone signals.
If you just want to plug a phone in, you don't need anything
between it and the jacks which are all standard rj11.
If you have the internet service, you plug this box into the rj11,
and it has an rj45 on it which hooks up to your nic.
Like I said, I'll try to find out exactly what this is called and how
to get more info on it.
Greg
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 06:19:18AM -0700, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
>
> If it is a T1 line, it needs two pieces of equipment, which may actually be
> built into a single device. First, there is the CSU/DSU, which is like a
> modem for dedicated lines. It is not, of course, a modem, but that is its
> metaphorical function in the dedicated environment. It handles the line
> coding, framing, signaling, etc. Then there is some kind of protocol
> router. This is, of course, usually a router for the IP
> protocols. Perhaps, the device you're talking about is a combo CSU/DSU and
> router; though I know of no such device manufactured by HP.
>
> Regards.
>
> At 08:32 PM 12/9/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >I'm not sure how it is possible, but it is.
> >I can find out more details.
> >This is not cable or dsl, it is t1.
> >Greg
> >
> >
> >On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 07:24:53PM -0500, Rich Caloggero wrote:
> > > Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > > >They're running t1 over here through this HP networking gizmo that
> > > >plugs into the phone jack, and has an rj45 jack on it.
> > > How is this possible? How can you run T1 over a phone line, unless perhaps
> > > it were some dedicated phone line, in which case its usually termed DSL for
> > > dedicated subscriber line. Normal phone lines just don't have the bandwidth
> > > to do this. I assume the other side of this box is a standard ethernet
> > port?
> > > We have such a box here at my house: one end plugs into a cable modem and
> > > the other has 4 ethernet ports which go to each of four computers. We all
> > > thus share the same cable connection. Its awesome!
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Gregory Nowak" <gnowak1 at uic.edu>
> > > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > > Sent: 06 December, 2001 10:52 PM
> > > Subject: Re: some networking questions, I'm slightly confused
> > >
> > >
> > > In kernel 2.4.16.
> > > Greg
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:56:42PM -0700, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> > > > Hi Gregory,
> > > >
> > > > On which Kernel version's source tree are you finding this
> > information? I
> > > > do not find it in 2.4.6.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > At 08:44 PM 12/6/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > > > >I am trying to do something like serial line load balancing, but with
> > > nics.
> > > > >It is described in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
> > > > >.
> > > > >Greg
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:11:14PM -0700, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmmm, this talk about bonding I am not understanding... Are you
> > > trying to
> > > > > > multihome with two different service providers? Please advise; I'm
> > > > > > apparently missing something.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 12:17 PM 12/6/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > > > > > >Yes, sort of.
> > > > > > >I'll have to talk to the guy running the service here when he gives
> > > me my
> > > > > > >second
> > > > > > >connection, and see if I'll get another ip address or not, and if he
> > > > > knows
> > > > > > >if his router will support bonding.
> > > > > > >Greg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:00:36PM -0700, Darrell Shandrow wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Good deal; I'll be glad to do what I can to help, especially with
> > > a
> > > > > > > > specific implementation. Did you get your answers regarding the
> > > > > two NICs
> > > > > > > > and the outside addressing?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At 09:56 PM 12/5/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > >Thanks for the info even though I knew 99% of that.
> > > > > > > > >I will be in touch if I need more help.
> > > > > > > > >Again, thanks for a very good explanation (it's certainly better
> > > > > then I
> > > > > > > > >could've done (grin)).
> > > > > > > > >Greg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 08:19:57PM -0700, Darrell Shandrow
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have stayed out of this until now because I haven't really
> > > had
> > > > > > > any time
> > > > > > > > > > to respond properly. My days are usually quite long
> > > > > > > lately. Anyhow, I am
> > > > > > > > > > a sys admin for a regional ISP; perhaps, I can help you.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > A domain is registered through a registrar like Network
> > > > > Solutions or
> > > > > > > > > > register.com. When the domain is registered, part of the
> > > required
> > > > > > > > > > information includes the IP addresses for the primary and
> > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > servers. This information is then added to what are known as
> > > > > the root
> > > > > > > > > > servers, which tell the entire world which primary and
> > > > > secondary name
> > > > > > > > > > servers know how to answer lookup questions about your
> > domain.
> > > In
> > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > words, the root servers delegate authority to the specified
> > > > > primary and
> > > > > > > > > > secondary name servers to answer questions concerning your
> > > domain
> > > > > > > > > > name. You could run one or both of these name servers
> > > yourself
> > > > > or have
> > > > > > > > > > someone else do DNS. It sounds like you are having someone
> > > else do
> > > > > > > > > primary
> > > > > > > > > > and secondary DNS. As I'm sure you already know, DNS is the
> > > > > domain
> > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > system, which points domain names to IP addresses, and which
> > > > > allows
> > > > > > > us to
> > > > > > > > > > do neat things like browse to www.foxnews.com and send
> > mail to
> > > > > > > > > > nu7i at azboss.net instead of having to know all kinds of awful
> > > IP
> > > > > > > addresses
> > > > > > > > > > just to perform the simplest of functions on the Internet.
> > > So,
> > > > > DNS
> > > > > > > points
> > > > > > > > > > a domain name to an IP address, but how does it work? DNS
> > > > > information
> > > > > > > > > > about a domain name is handled by name servers in the form of
> > > zone
> > > > > > > > > > files. Your domain exists as a zone file on the primary name
> > > > > > > server, and
> > > > > > > > > > the secondary name server is usually set up as a slave to the
> > > > > > > primary. In
> > > > > > > > > > other words, the secondary name server gets its information
> > > > > (the zone
> > > > > > > > > file)
> > > > > > > > > > from the primary name server and holds onto it, just in case
> > > the
> > > > > > > primary
> > > > > > > > > > name server is unavailable for some reason. The domain name
> > > > > system is
> > > > > > > > > > really a very large, world wide distributed database. A
> > > domain
> > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > contains various types of information which is managed in the
> > > > > form of
> > > > > > > > > > various types of records. The first type of record is SOA,
> > > which
> > > > > > > stands
> > > > > > > > > > for start of authority. This just specifies your primary and
> > > > > secondary
> > > > > > > > > > name servers. You see, if things were set up a certain way,
> > > your
> > > > > > > primary
> > > > > > > > > > and secondary name servers could actually delegate authority
> > > > > for your
> > > > > > > > > > domain to still other name servers, but this is not common
> > > > > > > > > > practice. Another important record type is the A record.
> > > This
> > > > > is the
> > > > > > > > > > address record, and your domain could have multiple A
> > records,
> > > > > > > > > depending on
> > > > > > > > > > how many subdomains you have set up. For example my domain
> > > name
> > > > > > > servers
> > > > > > > > > > have an A record for shandrow.com which points to
> > > > > > > > > 206.124.184.77. There is
> > > > > > > > > > also another A record for borg.shandrow.com, a subdomain,
> > > which
> > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > happens to point to the same IP address, though it could just
> > > > > as easily
> > > > > > > > > > point to another IP address. Another somewhat related record
> > > > > type is a
> > > > > > > > > > CNAME, which stands for canonical name. These records are
> > > used
> > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > aliases to point subdomains to other domains. For example, I
> > > > > did use a
> > > > > > > > > > CNAME record to point www.shandrow.com to shandrow.com, which
> > > > > means it
> > > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > has the IP address 206.124.184.77. Yet another important
> > > record
> > > > > > > type is
> > > > > > > > > > the MX record. MX stands for mail exchanger. E-mail
> > software
> > > > > uses
> > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > records when figuring out how to deliver e-mail on the
> > > > > Internet. These
> > > > > > > > > > records, numbered by priority, tell mail delivery software
> > > > > where mail
> > > > > > > > > > should go when destined for a particular domain. For
> > example,
> > > my
> > > > > > > first MX
> > > > > > > > > > record priority for shandrow.com (which is MX 10) points to
> > > > > > > > > > borg.shandrow.com. That is ultimately pointing to the
> > > Sendmail
> > > > > server
> > > > > > > > > > which runs on the IP address 206.124.184.77. But, again,
> > this
> > > > > > > could have
> > > > > > > > > > just as easily pointed to any Sendmail server which was
> > > > > configured to
> > > > > > > > > > accept and deliver mail for the shandrow.com domain.
> > > Additional MX
> > > > > > > > > records
> > > > > > > > > > can be defined so that, if the server specified in the first
> > > > > > > priority MX
> > > > > > > > > > record is unavailable for some reason, mail delivery software
> > > will
> > > > > > > try a
> > > > > > > > > > second, third, fourth and so on server until it can deliver
> > > the
> > > > > > > mail. I
> > > > > > > > > > could, if configured properly, have a MX 20 pointing
> > > shandrow.com
> > > > > > > to yet
> > > > > > > > > > another Sendmail server, which would be able to receive mail
> > > for
> > > > > > > > > > shandrow.com in the absence of the primary mail server.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Finally, there is reverse DNS. This does the reverse of the
> > > > > domain
> > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > > system; it translates IP addresses back to domain names. You
> > > > > > > definitely
> > > > > > > > > > want to have your DNS administrator set this up for your
> > > domain,
> > > > > > > because
> > > > > > > > > > certain FTP sites, web sites and other types of services on
> > > the
> > > > > > > Internet
> > > > > > > > > > use reverse DNS information for security purposes; they want
> > > to
> > > > > see
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > your forward DNS and reverse DNS point to the same place, or
> > > they
> > > > > > > may also
> > > > > > > > > > want to verify that you have a domain which is or is not
> > > > > registered
> > > > > > > in a
> > > > > > > > > > certain part of the world. In my example, performing a
> > > > > nslookup on
> > > > > > > the IP
> > > > > > > > > > address 206.124.184.77 will tell you that it reverses to
> > > > > > > > > borg.shandrow.com,
> > > > > > > > > > which is a valid subdomain pointing to that same IP address.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Anyhow, this will either help you or confuse you. Please let
> > > me
> > > > > > > know if I
> > > > > > > > > > can help you with specifics.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > At 06:38 PM 12/5/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >Well, I'll actually be running a mail server for the
> > building
> > > in
> > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > I live.
> > > > > > > > > > >Instead of being regularly payed, my current connection will
> > > be
> > > > > > > free, and
> > > > > > > > > > >I'll get a second free connection
> > > > > > > > > > >They're running t1 over here through this HP networking
> > gizmo
> > > that
> > > > > > > > > > >plugs into the phone jack, and has an rj45 jack on it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >The reason I'm asking about the dns stuff is because
> > > > > > > > > > >when I told the guy that I've looked at the mail admin docs,
> > > > > and am
> > > > > > > > > > >seriously considering running the server,
> > > > > > > > > > >his response to me was:
> > > > > > > > > > >"so, I'll need to get you a domain with primary and
> > secondary
> > > dns
> > > > > > > > > servers."
> > > > > > > > > > >I said yes to this, but am carious about how his dns servers
> > > > > will know
> > > > > > > > > > >where I exist
> > > > > > > > > > >since he didn't ask for the name of my box.
> > > > > > > > > > >I guess when he tells me he's got things set up,
> > > > > > > > > > >my first question to him will be,
> > > > > > > > > > >"what name do the dns servers know my machine by?"
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >He's macroslop licensed, but not meaning to brag,
> > > > > > > > > > >I get the impression that I may know more then he does
> > > without a
> > > > > > > license.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >In case some of you reading my post now are remembering
> > a few
> > > of
> > > > > > > my other
> > > > > > > > > > >posts, I decided
> > > > > > > > > > >that getting my own domain name wasn't worth it.
> > > > > > > > > > >He said that I could run a small web server here if I want.
> > > So, I
> > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > >think he'd
> > > > > > > > > > >have a problem with me running it as http://mybox.domain.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >This whole thing started when I got my service, and he came
> > > > > here to
> > > > > > > > > get it
> > > > > > > > > > >all setup.
> > > > > > > > > > >Not only was he impressed that I was the only one in the
> > > building
> > > > > > > so far
> > > > > > > > > > >running anything other then windblows, but that it was
> > Linux.
> > > > > > > > > > >After my configuring tcp/ip both in windows and in Linux
> > > while
> > > > > he just
> > > > > > > > > > >watched me do it and gave me my ip address and all the other
> > > > > stuff,
> > > > > > > > > > >I asked if I would get a mail account.
> > > > > > > > > > >He said no, because there is no body to run one yet.
> > > > > > > > > > >Then he tentatively asked if I would be willing to
> > perhaps do
> > > it,
> > > > > > > I said
> > > > > > > > > > >I'd read the mailadmin docs and think about it,
> > > > > > > > > > >and you know the rest.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >He's also looking to hire someone to run apachee.
> > > > > > > > > > >But, I'm not touching that for now (grin).
> > > > > > > > > > >Sorry for the long and personal post, but since Geoff asked,
> > > > > > > > > > >I figured that some other people on this list may be
> > > wondering
> > > > > > > > > > >why I'm asking theese questions, some of which may sound
> > > > > > > > > > >dumb, but are for the most part so that I could make sure
> > > that
> > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > > >I know is actually correct.
> > > > > > > > > > >Greg
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:29:48AM +1000, Geoff Shang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Say there is a primary and secondary dns servers
> > on a
> > > > > domain
> > > > > > > > > > > called mydomain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Say also that there is a machine called mybox.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I have ip addresses for primary and secondary dns
> > > > > > > servers on
> > > > > > > > > > > mydomain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Assumming all of the above, and assuming that I have
> > > > > > > permission to
> > > > > > > > > > > officially be on mydomain which is a valid internet domain,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > what do I do on mybox so that it would be resolvable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as mybox.mydomain on the net?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nothing. It's the primary and secondary DNS servers that
> > > > > control
> > > > > > > > > how your
> > > > > > > > > > > > host is resolved, not your box. As long as mybox has the
> > > IP
> > > > > > > > > address that
> > > > > > > > > > > > ns1.mydomain.com and ns2.mydomain.com think it has, you
> > > > > should be
> > > > > > > > > good to
> > > > > > > > > > > > go.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Say that I have to nics with 2 static ip address for
> > > the
> > > > > > > outside
> > > > > > > > > > > world.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > How do I set things up so that my box would use both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nics for outside access instead just either one nic or
> > > > > the other?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > As Chris said, what comes in where will depend on what
> > > > > address it
> > > > > > > > > is sent
> > > > > > > > > > > > to. What goes out where depends on a few things. If you
> > > > > want to
> > > > > > > > > use one
> > > > > > > > > > > > interface to access a particular host or network, you can
> > > > > set up a
> > > > > > > > > route
> > > > > > > > > > > > accordingly. If you want to access everything with both,
> > > you
> > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > be able
> > > > > > > > > > > > to put 2 default routes (i've seen it done but don't know
> > > if it
> > > > > > > > > works and
> > > > > > > > > > > > if it's supposed to work). I saw you've been looking at
> > > > > > > bonding which
> > > > > > > > > > > > might also work, but I don't know about it.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Can I ask, why you have 2 NICs? Is it just to get 2
> > > > > addresses or
> > > > > > > > > are you
> > > > > > > > > > > > connected to 2 networks?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Geoff.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > > >
> > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > >Speakup mailing list
> > > > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Speakup mailing list
> >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
More information about the Speakup
mailing list