Hewlet Packard and Linux

Sat Aug 25 02:32:05 EDT 2001

Could not agree with you more.  In the real world there are mechanics who
love the joy of building a fine running engine and getting under the hood
to fine tune it.  Then there are most people who could care less what's
under the hood as long as it's pretty, it runs and gets them from point a
to point b.  Likewise with Linux.  There are those who love to write
software without restraints and those who love to configure that software
to their style and taste.  That's the beauty of Linux and the thousands of
text based programs.  Yes every text based program has to be learned and
configured but that's the fun of it.  A blind person can configure Linux
however he pleases and yes it's a greasy job but at least we'll know how
to make it run like we want it and not like somebody else tells us how it
should be.
I'm learning the ropes of alsaplayer, freeamp, alsamixer, pmidi, play,
sfxload, etc:  I'm also learning about the many powerful features of the
Sound Blaster Live card.  I'm able to do things I could never do in
Winblows or a stereo player.  I can configure these command line programs
to play whatever songs I want to hear.  I can name my files whatever I
want to allow for better archiving for easier retrieving.  For example I
just figured out a few minutes ago that I can save my irish bagpipe .mp3
files by adding an extra extension to the end of .mp3 like for example a
song named  < sailer's lament.mp3.bp >  I added an .bp at the end of .mp3
so that when I want to play all my bagpipe mp3 files which may be in my
music directory I just simply type freeamp *.mp3.bp and bingo all my
bagpipe songs will play until all of the files with the extension bp at
the end of .mp3 are finished playing!  Now that's the joy of Linux!  Linux
allows me to listen to music in a way that's virtually impossible using
Windblows or a fancy expensive stereo equipment.
I just thought of another idea while I'm typing and that's the another
beauty about Linux if you can think it you can do it. Suppose you have
your favorite country music among others.  Just add fc to the end of the
mp3 extension and you can create a script that runs freeamp that allows
you just to type myfavoritecountrymusic and bingo all your favorite
country music starts up!  The possiblity are endless and that's why it's
hard to find a pre-configured Linux box to do everything like you want it
because every Linux box is probably configured to that person's taste.
We are a Linux community and we share our configurations and ideas with
others.  It's all about sharing.  We will never need the commercialized
version of Linux to fit our needs.  The blind linux community has all the
tools we need to share and to explore the endless possiblities.  We have
the tools to make the best speech interface computer this world has yet to
see.  We are just getting started.  We have not yet begun to fight. And in
accordance to a famous line "Give me liberty or give me death!"  "Give me
Linux or give me Windows!" Take your pick. <grin>
Rodney
The Weaving Beaver
rclowdus at kcnet.com
"Chop your own firewood and it will warm you twice."
"Weave your own cloth and it will reward you twice."

On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Gregory Nowak wrote:

> Linux is not a comercial product
> in the way that macroslop windows is.
> So, I don't think you have anything to worry about.
> There will always have to be a text console on a system, and you can edit init scripts
> to provent xwindows from starting up.
> Greg
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:33:46PM -0400, Charles Crawford wrote:
> > Liz,
> >
> >          I think you are wise to get ahead of the game by doing the stuff
> > Linux can do without the heartaches of configure configure configure.  If
> > Linux is to make the mainstream or at least a brook, then it has to work
> > for the average person without too much of the configuring issues.  I know,
> > its kind of plug and play, but why not have our cake and eat it too?  We
> > get the ease of setup and the power of Linux.  What's not to like?  Smile.
> >
> >          My bigger concern is the Xwindows problem of a repeat of what
> > Windows did to DOS.
> >
> > -- Charlie.
> > At 04:12 PM 08/24/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> > >>"no market," but the radical truth is more like "We haven't a
> > >>clue of how to get money for it."
> > >
> > >Forgive a comment from an extreme newbie who doesn't even *have* Linux yet.
> > >
> > >I've been looking at the companies who make Linux preinstalled systems
> > >(there's a long list at linux.org), and they seem to have some kind of
> > >market niche because some of them use hardware that has been tested and is
> > >known to be Linux-compatible.  With the Windoze dominance of the entire
> > >computing market, it's attractive to me to buy a system whose components
> > >are known to be compatible with Linux.  It seems better than ordering
> > >elsewhere and not being sure the different parts of the system will work
> > >well with Linux.
> > >
> > >any comments or thoughts?
> > >
> > >Liz
> > >Liz Hare, Ph.D.
> > >Research Associate
> > >Animal Breeding and Genetics Group
> > >B47 Morrison Hall
> > >Cornell University
> > >Ithaca, NY 14853
> > >(607) 255 2380
> > >eh51 at cornell.edu
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Speakup mailing list
> > >Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > >http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>