FW: BRIAN LIVINGSTON: "Window Manager" from InfoWorld.com, Monday,June 26, 2000

[Victor Tsaran]

Kirk, by the way, this is true. I thought I was the only one who noticed
this. For whatever reason, downloading on a Linux box is a bit faster. Why?
And yet, how can we refuse use Windows? Most of the good software is written
for Windows. Cakewalk, for instance, is one of them.
Regards,
Vic

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Reiser" <kirk at braille.uwo.ca>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 3:51 AM
Subject: Re: FW: BRIAN LIVINGSTON: "Window Manager" from InfoWorld.com,
Monday,June 26, 2000


> I don't think this is much of an issue.  Linux networking is quite a bit
> more efficient than any of the Microsoft products.  Some time just for
> grins check the differences between downloading and uploading on a
> linux box and on a win-95/98 box.
>
>   Kirk
>
> --
>
> Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility
> e-mail: kirk at braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario
> phone: (519) 661-3061
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup